SORU: aşağıdaki parçaya göre cevaplayınız
It is pointed out in the passage that though there are differences of opinion within the judiciary, ----.
The US Supreme Court is not a radical institution, nor
is it likely to become one as a result of any particular
presidential election. The risks for the judiciary in
presidential elections are a lot lower than many
people imagine. This is not because there are no
significant ideological or methodological differences
among judges. Differences do exist, and they display
party affiliation to some extent. And they matter – not
just on public issues such as abortion rights and
racial discrimination but also in those procedures that
actually guide the way lower courts handle a large
variety of legal cases. That said, the courts have
pretty strong institutional defences against radicalism
of any kind. For one thing, the judiciary's power is
spread among more than 800 federal judges, no one
of whose views matter all that much in the broad
scheme of things. Even on the Supreme Court the
idiosyncrasies or ideological extremism of any one
judge can have only a limited effect. Without four likeminded
judges, his or her views are just noise.